World
The Plan, Championed by Nigel Farage's Party, Would See Naval Forces Intercept All Migrant Boats and Return Them to France
Reform UK has reignited debate with its pledge to deploy the Royal Navy on a mission dubbed "Operation Fortress, described as the largest military operation in the English Channel since World War Two."
Reform UK has reignited debate with its pledge to deploy the Royal Navy on a mission dubbed "Operation Fortress, described as the largest military operation in the English Channel since World War Two. The plan, championed by Nigel Farage's party, would see naval forces intercept all migrant boats and return them to France or Belgium. Labour dismissed the announcement as "reheated" and argued that "anger and easy answers won't bring crossings down.
The party insists the approach aligns with international law and would include emergency legislation if needed. However, legal experts Sean O'Grady and Athena Stavrou highlight significant obstacles. While using the navy for logistics, surveillance, and commanding Border Force is lawful, direct engagement with small boats is fraught with legal and practical issues.
Causing injury or death would constitute a common law offence, as irregular migration is a civil matter. The absolute right to claim asylum under domestic and international law cannot be abrogated. Multiple conventions, including the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, mandate rescuing those in danger at sea.
Pushing migrants into French waters would violate French sovereignty and risk retaliation, potentially escalating into a mini cold war between the UK and France or the EU. The UN convention obliges all seafarers, including navies, to assist anyone in danger, which is why Border Force and the RNLI bring occupants to shore. A naval pushback against a dinghy would be hazardous and could easily endanger lives.
The Royal Navy previously commanded Border Force between 2019 and 2023, reportedly disliking the role and seeing no difference. Australia's success with pushbacks relied on different conditions: larger boats, international waters, and willing partner nations. None of these exist in the Channel, where there are no international waters and no nearby countries willing to accept migrants.
Source: Independent UK News







